Among all the political chaos the Chancellor has just announced a significant investment in Britain’s buses. But what does this mean for rural services?
A free pass for buses?
As part of his first spending review as Chancellor of the Exchequer, Sajid Javid has announced a new £200 million investment ‘to transform bus services around the country’.
After years of cuts this comes as welcome news, but how much will this help people desperate for a regular bus service to their village?
The short answer is we don’t yet know. So far the government has revealed very little detail about this new funding. While any investment in our bus system is welcome, we need more information to understand how it will be spent, and to see if it’s actually new money after all.
Rural areas desperately need more and better bus services after thousands of routes across the country have been reduced or withdrawn over the past decade. The loss of bus services can have a devastating impact on countryside communities, especially for those people who don’t or can’t drive. Many rural villages are not seen as profitable destinations by commercial bus companies. Without government subsidised routes these areas can become inaccessible to many groups in society, leaving communities to slowly hollow out.
Older people living in the countryside are often reliant on buses to reach vital services such as GPs and post offices, so the loss of a bus route can make rural life incredibly difficult as people grow older. Similarly, subsidised buses are essential for allowing younger people to stay connected and reach schools and colleges. Where bus services have disappeared younger people living in villages are often forced to move to towns and cities, breaking apart communities and undermining social cohesion. For those who can’t afford to own or run a car, the loss of bus services can make going to work almost impossible, while accessing benefits requires walking for miles on unsafe roads.
In this context it’s easy to welcome the Chancellor’s £200 million investment in buses, but there are some important caveats.
As with all government spending, we need to know in detail how the spending will be allocated between rural and urban areas. Urban areas receive far more spending per capita than rural areas across a whole range of services and if the Chancellor’s £200 million follows this pattern it will do little to help reconnect cut-off rural communities.
So before we can celebrate the additional money for buses we also need to know how it will be spent. If the £200 million is allocated to the Bus Services Operator Grant it will simply support the profitability of existing bus services. But if the money is used to reverse cuts to local authority supported bus services it could return lost bus routes to cut-off villages across the countryside.
This is true across the board for the Chancellor’s latest announcements. The devil is in the detail, and the detail is lacking. At times, even the money is lacking: £30 million to fund net zero projects at BEIS falls woefully short of the commitments needed to tackle the climate emergency declared by Parliament.
CPRE will monitor these issues closely and continue to promote the need for affordable, low carbon, public transport options so that everyone living in a rural area can travel sustainably and access the services they need.
More blogs
-
Farming for the community2019-10-10A free pass for buses?2019-09-06Johnson's countryside challenge2019-07-26The Time Is Now - what happened?2019-07-12There can be no ‘business as normal’2019-05-20The power of the next generation2019-03-08Let’s celebrate the power of trees2018-11-23Letwin Review: An opportunity to tackle the housing crisis without sacrificing the countryside2018-10-24Watching the party games2014-10-10
